Very few people know the reason behind the different legal rulings coming from preachers, Muftis and Imams in the West as opposed to the legal rulings found in the works of Fiqh and other texts of Islamic sciences.
Some people think it is a matter of “manhaj”. In other words, they attribute the issue to matters of Aqeedah, methodology in approaching evidences, i.e. Usul, or outside pressure from corrupt governments and security agencies.
The reality behind contradictory legal rulings in the West and large parts of the Muslim world is due to the secret implementation of the “Jurisprudence of Minorities” by almost all Muslim institutions, legal bodies, organizations, and universities.
The entire basis of this new type of Fiqh developed less than 30 years ago in the US by an ex-military officer from Iraq is to replace the original legal rulings [Azaa’im] with dispensations [Rukhkhas] on the basis of Muslims living under the authority of Disbelievers as “minorities”.
Debating with these presidents, boards, chairpersons, and the Muftis, Imams, scholars and teachers hired by them is futile. Most of them don’t even know they are part of the implementation of this false type of Fiqh.
Leave a Reply